Raw Money Scream?

Having yet to find* my earlier reference to Romney and the Dean Scream, it appears the ball has deflated. 

* There was an event where Romney seemed to be echoing the Dean Scream in support of 2014 candidates. 

Mitt Returns Wife's Gift

One might say it is politics,

but it is probably business.

But allow me an Etch-a-Sketch moment:

Ann Romney's gift was a re-gift of used analogy.

Ann claimed her gift from Hilary Rosen last week, but 3 months ago her husband used it up* on the campaign trail, when he claimed that stay-at-home moms lack "the dignity of work".

* Mitt would pay to deprive stay at home mom's this privilege.

[More on Romney "flexibility" versus President Obama's hot mic on Russia:

What I take away is that he will be a lot more "flexible" after they return to power. That way he won't have to oppose what Republicans have done to stand in the way of President Obama's plans for helping the country and the economy, not that they will not undo what he has done that has worked.

here.]

[The talk and what's up with Chris Hayes.]

[Speaking of flexibility.]

[RES PEC TRM-ONEY: I won't suggest the tune this be sung to.]

[Hide and Seek: Gaffers Tape and GOP Records.]

[Olly Olly Oxen Free: The Last Word ?]

WOE / Wae

War on Executives:

Romney charges Obama with "real war upon women".

Hides behind women against women.

WOE to woe-men!

Or War Against Evidence:

I am not saying that the Republicans are waging a war on women or that Democrats are not saying it. I am saying there are two questions which I will not answer, who started the war and who started calling it a war? I am also saying that I have not found the evidence in the links attached here, and suggesting that there is a war no matter who calls it a war or who started calling it a war.

I have yet to find who started the claim that there is a war on women. I am not saying that I don't believe that Obama could have used the term*, I just haven't found it.**

* war on women, war against women, war for women...'s votes.

[Google of the Day? Is it an anomaly that Steve Benen on Rachel Maddow Blog is the second hit for the question. "When did..." re-framed as "Has President Obama said there is a war on women?" Third Frame: "Obama talks about war on women." Fourth fishing trip? No War on Women. WOW! ]

[OK, I have an un-Warren Ted side trip, and not a cheat sheet. But just to be clear**]

[Jumping in the Lakoff! But Republicans cannot win the VFW.(Victory for Women or Victory from Whining.) It is a victory for wordplay.]

< Speaking of victory for wordplay, Thom Hartmann takes on the West word Hoe[!] >

** added 4-13-12 (** that is) Haven't found the President using the term but Debbie Wasserman-Schultz is quoted using it without full context in the CSM.

** Follow up?

Bane-R-Us!

The Commercial 4,^ the Capitalization Crowd.*

[The Etch-A-Sketch is sold by Toys-R-Us which is owned by Bain Capital^. The Ohio Art Company product was originally a French^ idea^, renamed in American production, now made in China^.]

*Bane Nor Nation

^ 3-22-12 bold and # alteration " for" clarity "," and links added.

Not so simple.

Romney and Santorum on gum-mint funding.

It might not be so simple for us to blame Republicans for taking Federal funds. It can easily be said that they just want their money back. This is aside from their insanity about cutting taxes and spending. But it does seem that they will spend it as long as they don't have to take responsibility for taxing for it.

Will Lard 16:3

Dog so loved...

Calm adore Perry and the FOF Found- ation [!]

(sic)* series.[unspelled asterisks]

* Ctrl F: "(sic)" i.e. irony mark

[unmarked segue between line one and two,

with two bold links actually read this time, but with transliterated** ledes.. ]

** Well, not exactly, maybe transmitterated(sic), ala Costa Concordia.

3rd (sic) > BS*** "trumanesque"

*** i.e. blog search

BTW: those still standing

Romney: moderate/conservative flip-flopper

Gingrich: populist flip-flopper

Santorum: conservative

Paul: libertarian

This about rounds it out.

[But who am I to tell the GOP?]

[1-20-12: What is Governor Perry "talking turkey"?

It is the the pot calling the kettle white.]

To Be Arranged

(Re-modeling) Right Column:*
postings and other sources**
Navigation 1st use
Navigation II 1st use
Navigation 3.0 1st use
See those labels below, as they may evolve.
Labels 1st use

IMAGE INSERTED (see bottom line)

[Post-image insert, note ledes under leeds must be edited.
i.e. typo sometimes let go, sometimes intended, but who knows, or vise verse us[!]]


For the time being I will leave item 2 "as is."
But to note ledes:
Primary Boogeyman
Pay Dirt / Tax Mud
Calm Pend E Um
Table of Contents
Churned Media
Navigation 3.0
Making New Rounds
Right To Life
Leaking Intelligence
Odyssey Dawn
There was nothing...
Think Blue
I Told You So
The Tetrahedron
The one thing?
Segue/Sabbatical
2-20-11 Under Construction
The Maze of Mace
The Answering Machine
Bridging the English Channel
Note: this is the content at the link Navigation II(see label) as of 1-17-12

*this will be item 1
** see comment (1 below) regarding template upgrade
[template upgrade has evolved my need for change]

IT MAY HAVE NOW BECOME UNNECESSARY FOR ME TO INSERT PREVIOUS POST.***
THE BLOG ARCHIVE IS NOW WHERE I WAS GOING TO LOCATE ITEMS 1, 2 etc.
[This condition may evolve as I play with formats/templates.]
Labels label added.

*** apologies for anachronistic asterisks (No TrippleA [I. e!])
NFRY = not fully read yet: AKA not necessarily to be read soon.
Also not necessarily a valuable label, as it applies so frequently.
Today's Alex Wagner and Andrea Mitchell, especially the latter with Chris Matthews review a lot of the haggling of the Republican Race(slash debate), context and hyperbole.(see 1-17-12 scroll down here) Speaking of LBO[!] See AM and Leveraged Buy Outs and links lost(I thought I had embedded it somewhere today).(not to mention up tight[a,b,c] or out of sight asides.)(see lost here and found there, under fanciful economics, but not nfry.)[Meet the Press/FOXnews]
[Not pun/link TrippleA a D'Ribble: A ribble is a ribbing and a riddle. Not always labeled. First uses: Ribble, further parsing of first uses may be problematic. But here is a shot at D'Ribble and G'Ribble. A D'Ribble is a De-Ribble with few permutations, while a Grand Ribble may be close to an Obama Ribble which was probably an accident.]
[Not to go on and on, but related to the pre-bracketed regarding NFRY and AM(slash)race "the nation"...]
[Speaking of anachronisms (See Image/inserts)]

Under the Table?

The point is four legs[**].
Another point is that I have not posted them yet.
There just so happens to be four.
Not that they are Romney*, Gingrich, Santorum, or Hunt*[s]*man, let alone Paul.

*anachronism alert:
[**] done [As to in the process*** of coordinating the legs.]
[The previous four posts were rough drafted Thursday 1-12-12, here are some coordinated links.
Rachel Maddow, Lawrence O'Donnell, No Bain Or...]
*** [They are Rachel, Lawrence and Colbert, not to mention Schultz.]
[But the "under the table" is a reference to getting things on the table [!]

And the not so plane truth.]

[Sub-Text? Freedom is not a fool.
Here are the four posts:
Up Tight?
Triumvirate
Vulture or Social Contract?
Heterodoxy.
Or context?]
[And as usual Martin Bashir covers it
in his show.]
[Then(later)there is Dylan Ratigan, The War on War and Iran, or who ran?]
[And Al Sharpton with PoliticsNation]
[another four legs:
Center for American Progress,
OurFuture.org,
NewYorkTimes,
Foreign Policy,
and odd balance.]

*[s]* 6-10-13 Spell check?  "s" added.

Heterodoxy

The Lawrence O'Donnell Show / Chris Hayes

Republicans are saying what Obama couldn't.

< previous post >

Vultures or Social Contract?

Vulture Capitalism or the Big Three?
OK, the links take some thinking and twisting.

But The Last[*] Word is still rolling.

[*] note anachronism

< previous post >

Up Tight?

Out of Sight?
Or just jam up...
and dog-on man?

[Rachel Maddow]
*note anachronism

< previous post >

Freedom is not a tool.

Not that it is not a force.
Nor is it a farce.
But here is the source:

Freedom is not a tool*.
What is economic freedom?**

* "but an end that doesn't justify economics."
** what is "clear and unapologetic"
*** C-rhetoric


[C-schtick ] ***


< previous post >

Wrong Track Romney

Mixed Metaphor Mangler Mitt *: Debt Picture 101

The Big Dig or Jig [?]

The Track? (not exactly ... [!])

* Facebook comment:  
     See Clip, Romney: "I'm here to collect." That sounds like an entitlement that is on the wrong track. The economy has turned around**, and that is not to say that it has been Obama's economy. How can Republicans complain about the budget operating on continuing resolutions while giving Obama the credit for the economy.
     Speaking of tracks, the government can not be operated like a business. Where is the profit? Not to mention the cost of some of the outrageous expectations that previous administrations have burdened the future with in the unfunded mandates, Terror/Afghan/Iraq war, and Bush tax cuts.

[who cares !  Some do. . . ]***

** misc. economic metrics

*** could not locate The Place for Politics that had a chart outlining what it takes in the primaries and caucuses for a Republican to win, not necessarily what determines who the nominee will actually be.  

[Facebook tangent.]

[Post Iowa Caucus it is a battle between Romney and Santorum @25%, with Ron Paul 21%, Newt Gingrich 13%, and Perry with 10%, not to mention Bachman 5%, and Huntsman 1%.  Note that Ron Paul gave a spirited "we are all Austrian", on to New Hampshire speech, while Newt had his "ticket punched".]

> charts <
< previous post >

Para-model

I will begin at the end, or rather the present.
Less than two paragraphs in:
What's Left of the Left. Why do I begin at that moment? Allow me to begin again at this moment.
What is Left of the Left?
(the lede of the link)(4)***
Is this a geometric or quantitative heading?
What is not right about the left?
Or how much of the left is still there?

Now if I may do a Hansel and Gretel impersonation...my point is that I have worked out my path off-blog. i.e. left some pebbles to attempt to trace my path.
The reality is that I got the article from** MSNBC*, (current lede) Actually I got the link not the article. So I am still working it out, but will now save my Para-model.doc with this.

* actual clip here later
**anachronistic conundrum(or appropriate con un drum)[Cain beating the media.(1)]
*** post save doc: golf term "four"/Mulligan?

[Now I must note that I will square [bracket(#)] and or continue after reading more.]
[I should now note that I have left open a blog I was editing, which has now been inserted in my Para-model.doc ala my Hansel and Gretal MO. Apparently the pebbles were bread crumbs, but in reading What is Left of the Left, noticing that I have read only one of seven pages, I must MoveOn for the time being.]
[Now... actually just moments after the last bracket I will make a point.(see **(1) On what the heck is Cain doing? He is working the model of the media, in a fourth branch sort of way. He is getting attention, and I will sort out that fourth dimension. And I must note I am impressed with Joe the Plumber and Rupert the Survivor as candidates of a third kind. Not to call them, "Out There". But I think there is something to the polarity and needing more perspectives than our parties and branches provide. And this is reflected in a mechanics and dynamics, that is not just two dimensional. But Steven Jobs did point out to Rupert Murdoch that it can be either constructive or destructive. It is not about left or right, up or down, or forward or back again. It is about making progress or not. Everything else is how, and by and for whom? Does any of this embedded here or in my saved doc, explain: that the more radical a comment the more coverage it gets? It might depend on if one is Leaning Forward or Fair and Balanced. Now, I know that there is some perspectivism here, but Fair and Balanced does not mean two dimensional. Now it just depends on if I am talking about the Media or Faux News.]
[My apologies for my Quantum Leap over the Big Cheese, I feel my bread crumbs may be safe in draft see image.]


[Andrea Mitchell: Why has the president waited? Because he wanted congress to do their job! That was my preemptive answer to the preemptive question. Meaning, I was expecting the question and anticipated the answer, which just may be in the unfinished heading: What is Left of the Left.(No question mark or exclaimation mark?)]
[Speaking of Hands or Thumbs: L-curve anyone?]


[My para-model.doc is a bibliograpy of sorts(pun intended). Some Late Entries.: not to mention blog searches for con+scious, con+science, anarchy, tyranny, and thumb and buffet.]
[For the record Searches @thumb= Star Chamber/Big Cheese/Para-Model/Obama Doctrine/Who are they calling?. @buffet= Para-model/Big Cheese/From GOP to NOP/Brackets and Debt Clock/N-oddly Enough/All Politics is Local/Commander in Chief/Off the Cliff/Irony versus Hypocrisy. By this I am recording what the Al Gore Rythms find, just in case something changes.]
[This is bleapin' freaky considering my heading and intention here: The last of my late entries, and the last thing(or link) in my para-model.doc is this and (THIS)is the first thing Ed Schultz is talking about when I turn on his show. QED? Not to mention the rest of his show, which is yet to run(he is going on about Romney in Ohio? and a clear plan, and Democrats losing the message war, then Bernie Sanders and the NYtimes poll?), but is actually digitally delayed for local radio.]

Still going? QED?]